Universitätsmedizin Rostock - Teilkörperschaft der Universität Rostock

Quality results

Treatment sector: Liver transplantation (TX-LTX) Explanation

Information about this treatment area (documentation)

Designation	Lebertransplantation
Shortcut	LTX
Number of cases	9
Documentation rate	100 %
Hospital comment	Die Dokumentationsrate wurde krankenhausbezogen berechnet.

Summary result:

In 2 of 3 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
No assessment is possible for any quality characteristic

Number of patients treated: 9

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Hide national result

Quality criterion

Hospital result
and target area

Quality objective
achieved?

All information

This is how rarely patients died during their hospital stay

National result: 10,04 %
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at most 20,00 %

Quality objective achieved
Why?

Click here

This is how rarely Patients died due to complications within 24 hours of the transplant

National result: 0,70 %
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at most 5,00 %

Quality objective not achieved

Click here

This is how low the proportion of patients was who had to stay in hospital for a very long time after the transplantion

National result: 23,56 %
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at most 30,00 %

Quality objective achieved

Click here

Code ID	2096
Result (%)	Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue	Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to have been achieved. For more information, see All information (click here) at the bottom under Comment or Technical note. (U99)
Population	Data protection
Events observed	Data protection
Anticipated events	Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	10,04
Target range (reference range)	<= 20,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	8,05 - 12,46
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DEQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level	Dem Krankenhaus wurden Hinweise zu möglichen Verbesserungspotenzialen gegeben
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this calculated result may not be exclusively influenced by the respective facility. For example, the severity of the disease or concomitant diseases of the patients can have an influence on the result. The reference range indicates in which range the results of an indicator are assessed as unremarkable. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially mathematically conspicuous: this usually results in an analysis in the Structured Dialogue. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation may also be attributable, for example, to faulty documentation or to individual cases. The assessment of quality is carried out within the framework of the Structured Dialogue with the facilities.

Code ID	2097
Result (%)	Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is not in the target area. The hospital did not meet the quality target. For more information, see All information (click here) at the bottom under Comment or Technical note. (A99)
Population	Data protection
Events observed	Data protection
Anticipated events	Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	verschlechtert
National result (%)	0,70
Target range (reference range)	<= 5,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	0,30 - 1,62
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DEQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level	Dem Krankenhaus wurden Hinweise zu Verbesserungspotenzialen gegeben
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.

Code ID	2133
Result (%)	Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue	The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population	Data protection
Events observed	Data protection
Anticipated events	Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year	unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year	unverändert
National result (%)	23,56
Target range (reference range)	<= 30,00 %
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	20,47 - 26,95
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DEQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions.