Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment (over 5,500 cGy x cm2)
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded (max. 250 ml) during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment.
Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to have been achieved. For more information, see "All information (click here)".
So often catheter examinations were well justified because coronary vessels were actually so severely narrowed that treatment was necessary
Code ID
56000
Result (%)
95,47
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
1104
Events observed
1054
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verbessert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
64,25
Target range (reference range)
>= 40,97 % (5, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
64,05 - 64,45
Hospital confidence interval (%)
94,12 - 96,58
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Catheter examinations were performed so rarely, although there was no pathological narrowing of coronary vessels
Code ID
56001
Result (%)
23,06
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
1067
Events observed
246
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verbessert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
verbessert
National result (%)
27,91
Target range (reference range)
<= 41,48 % (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
27,71 - 28,11
Hospital confidence interval (%)
20,60 - 25,65
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
This is how often the balloon catheter procedure started within the first hour after admission to hospital
Code ID
56003
Result (%)
87,61
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
113
Events observed
99
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
76,37
Target range (reference range)
>= 67,57 % (5, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
75,91 - 76,83
Hospital confidence interval (%)
80,61 - 92,72
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely was the time of arrival of patients at the hospital or the start of the balloon catheter procedure not recorded in writing
Code ID
56004
Result (%)
3,42
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
117
Events observed
4
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
2,71
Target range (reference range)
<= 5,98 % (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
2,54 - 2,88
Hospital confidence interval (%)
1,16 - 7,92
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure during a cardiac catheterisation examination (over 2,800 cGy x cm2)
Code ID
56005
Result
1,31
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
1661
Events observed
256
Anticipated events
195,63
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result
0,89
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,65 (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide
0,88 - 0,90
Hospital confidence interval
1,16 - 1,48
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structure in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without it being possible to attribute responsibility for e.g. resulting more frequent complications to one facility. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure for balloon catheter treatment (over 4,800 cGy x cm2)
Code ID
56006
Result
1,29
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
311
Events observed
86
Anticipated events
66,73
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result
0,94
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,14 (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide
0,92 - 0,97
Hospital confidence interval
1,04 - 1,58
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structures in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without one facility being held responsible for, for example, more frequent complications as a result. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment (over 5,500 cGy x cm2)
Code ID
56007
Result
1,32
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
935
Events observed
218
Anticipated events
165,12
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result
0,90
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,50 (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide
0,89 - 0,91
Hospital confidence interval
1,15 - 1,50
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structure in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without it being possible to attribute responsibility for e.g. resulting more frequent complications to one facility. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
It is rare that the radiation exposure of patients during a cardiac catheterisation procedure is not recorded in writing.
Code ID
56008
Result (%)
0,17
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
2915
Events observed
5
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
0,21
Target range (reference range)
<= 0,15 % (90, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,20 - 0,22
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,07 - 0,38
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded during cardiac catheter examinations (max. 150 ml)
Code ID
56009
Result (%)
10,21
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is not in the target area. The hospital did not meet the quality target. For more information, see All information (click here) at the bottom under Comment or Technical note. (A99)
Population
1665
Events observed
170
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
National result (%)
4,41
Target range (reference range)
<= 6,86 % (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
4,35 - 4,47
Hospital confidence interval (%)
8,83 - 11,73
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Der Stellungnahme war eine höher werdende Komplexität der Eingriffe zu entnehmen. Die Fachkommission bestätigt, dass komplexere Eingriffe zugenommen haben. Diese haben jedoch alle Kliniken zu verzeichnen. Die Ergebnisse des Leistungserbringers weichen jedoch deutlich von den Bundes- und Landesergebnissen ab, die nicht durch die Ausführungen in der Stellungnahme begründbar sind. Zudem hat sich das Ergebnis des Leistungserbringers in diesem Indikator im Verlauf deutlich verschlechtert. Der Leistun
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Die Analyse zeigt - dass es sich bei den Koronarangiographien nicht um Routinediagnostiken handelte, sondern um komplexe diagnostische Herzkatheter.<div>Der erhöhte Kontrastmittelverbrauch ergibt sich durch das komplexe und vorselektionierte Patientengut eines Maximalversorgers.<br></div><div>Es wurden bereits Maßnahmen getroffen, die zu einer Einsparung von Kontrastmittel beitragen sollen.<br></div>
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded in balloon catheter treatments (max. 200 ml)
Code ID
56010
Result (%)
20,45
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
313
Events observed
64
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verbessert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
17,16
Target range (reference range)
<= 21,93 % (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
16,68 - 17,65
Hospital confidence interval (%)
16,26 - 25,17
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded (max. 250 ml) during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment.
Code ID
56011
Result (%)
20,49
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is not in the target area. The hospital did not meet the quality target. For more information, see All information (click here) at the bottom under Comment or Technical note. (A99)
Population
937
Events observed
192
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
National result (%)
9,88
Target range (reference range)
<= 16,84 % (95, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
9,77 - 10,00
Hospital confidence interval (%)
18,00 - 23,16
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Der Stellungnahme war eine höher werdende Komplexität der Eingriffe zu entnehmen. Die Fachkommission bestätigt, dass komplexere Eingriffe zugenommen haben. Diese haben jedoch alle Kliniken zu verzeichnen. Die Ergebnisse des Leistungserbringers weichen jedoch deutlich von den Bundes- und Landesergebnissen ab, die nicht durch die Ausführungen in der Stellungnahme begründbar sind. Zudem hat sich das Ergebnis des Leistungserbringers in diesem Indikator im Verlauf deutlich verschlechtert. Der Leistun
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Die Analyse zeigt - dass es sich bei den Koronarangiographien nicht um Routinediagnostiken handelte, sondern um komplexe diagnostische Herzkatheter.<div>Der erhöhte Kontrastmittelverbrauch ergibt sich durch das komplexe und vorselektionierte Patientengut eines Maximalversorgers.<br></div><div>Es wurden bereits Maßnahmen getroffen, die zu einer Einsparung von Kontrastmittel beitragen sollen.</div>
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
This is how often blood flow improved in patients with sudden severe symptoms and suspected heart attacks
Code ID
56014
Result (%)
94,24
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
139
Events observed
131
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
94,29
Target range (reference range)
>= 93,65 % (5, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
94,05 - 94,52
Hospital confidence interval (%)
89,43 - 97,24
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So often blood flow improved due to the cardiac catheterisation procedure
Code ID
56016
Result (%)
94,15
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
1111
Events observed
1046
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
unverändert
National result (%)
95,31
Target range (reference range)
>= 93,95 % (5, Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
95,23 - 95,39
Hospital confidence interval (%)
92,65 - 95,42
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.