Klinikum Fichtelgebirge gGmbH - Haus Marktredwitz

Quality results

Treatment sector: Knee endoprosthesis supply: first insertion or exchange (KEP) Explanation

Information about this treatment area (documentation)

Designation	Knieendoprothesenversorgung
Shortcut	KEP
Number of cases	85
Documentation rate	100 %
Hospital comment	Die Dokumentationsrate wurde krankenhausbezogen berechnet.

Summary result:

No assessment is possible for one quality characteristic

Number of patients treated: 85

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Hide national result

Quality criterion

Hospital result
and target area

Quality objective
achieved?

All information

This is how often no replacement of the artificial knee joint or individual parts was necessary within 90 days of an initial operation

National result: 99,80 %
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at least 98,81 %

Assessment not possible

Click here

Code ID	54128
Result (%)	Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue	An evaluation is not possible because there were no patients in the hospital to whom this quality criterion could be applied. (N01)
Population	Data protection
Events observed	Data protection
Anticipated events	Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year	eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)	99,80
Target range (reference range)	>= 98,81 % (5. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)	99,78 - 99,82
Hospital confidence interval (%)	0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection	No
Type of value	QI
Relation to the procedure	DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG It should be noted that this computational result may not be influenced exclusively by the respective institution. For example, the severity of illnesses or concomitant diseases of the patients have an impact on the result. The reference range indicates the range in which the results of an indicator are assessed as normal. A facility with a result outside the reference range is initially computationally conspicuous, which usually results in an analysis in the structured dialog. It should be noted that an indicator result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a poor quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also e.g. be traceable to incorrect documentation or to individual cases. Quality is assessed in the context of the structured dialogue with the institutions. This quality indicator represents both events such as Complications that occur before discharge from a hospital, as well as events that occur after discharge but can still be related to the implantation.