Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment (over 5,500 cGy x cm2)
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded (max. 250 ml) during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment.
Although the result is not in the target area, the quality target is still considered to have been achieved. For more information, see "All information (click here)".
So often catheter examinations were well justified because coronary vessels were actually so severely narrowed that treatment was necessary
Code ID
56000
Result (%)
13,04
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is not in the target area. The hospital did not meet the quality target. There are indications of structural and process deficiencies. (A71)
Population
69
Events observed
9
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
verschlechtert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
64,25
Target range (reference range)
>= 40,97 % (5. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
64,05 - 64,45
Hospital confidence interval (%)
6,65 - 22,45
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Die Indikation sollte nach Leitlinie gestellt werden, Vorhofflimmern reicht als Indikationsstellung nicht aus.
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Catheter examinations were performed so rarely, although there was no pathological narrowing of coronary vessels
Code ID
56001
Result (%)
38,54
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
96
Events observed
37
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
27,91
Target range (reference range)
<= 41,48 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
27,71 - 28,11
Hospital confidence interval (%)
29,26 - 48,50
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
This is how often the balloon catheter procedure started within the first hour after admission to hospital
Code ID
56003
Result (%)
73,33
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
15
Events observed
11
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
76,37
Target range (reference range)
>= 67,57 % (5. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
75,91 - 76,83
Hospital confidence interval (%)
48,34 - 90,26
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely was the time of arrival of patients at the hospital or the start of the balloon catheter procedure not recorded in writing
Code ID
56004
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
2,71
Target range (reference range)
<= 5,98 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
2,54 - 2,88
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure during a cardiac catheterisation examination (over 2,800 cGy x cm2)
Code ID
56005
Result
0,36
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
257
Events observed
11
Anticipated events
30,93
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result
0,89
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,65 (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide
0,88 - 0,90
Hospital confidence interval
0,19 - 0,62
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structure in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without it being possible to attribute responsibility for e.g. resulting more frequent complications to one facility. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure for balloon catheter treatment (over 4,800 cGy x cm2)
Code ID
56006
Result
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
An evaluation is not possible because there were no patients in the hospital to whom this quality criterion could be applied. (N01)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result
0,94
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,14 (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide
0,92 - 0,97
Hospital confidence interval
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structures in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without one facility being held responsible for, for example, more frequent complications as a result. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
Ratio of actual to expected rate of increased radiation exposure during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment (over 5,500 cGy x cm2)
Code ID
56007
Result
0,62
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
115
Events observed
12
Anticipated events
19,45
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result
0,90
Target range (reference range)
<= 1,50 (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide
0,89 - 0,91
Hospital confidence interval
0,34 - 1,05
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
Risk adjustment aims to compensate for the different patient structure in different facilities. Ideally, this leads to a fair comparison of the different facilities, since patients have individual risk factors (such as concomitant diseases) that systematically influence the quality outcome, without it being possible to attribute responsibility for e.g. resulting more frequent complications to one facility. With the help of risk adjustment, the quality outcome of, for example, an institution with many high-risk cases can be statistically compared more fairly with the quality outcome of an institution with many low-risk cases. More information on risk adjustment can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen. The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered suspicious. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
It is rare that the radiation exposure of patients during a cardiac catheterisation procedure is not recorded in writing.
Code ID
56008
Result (%)
0,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
372
Events observed
0
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
0,21
Target range (reference range)
<= 0,15 % (90. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
0,20 - 0,22
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,67
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded during cardiac catheter examinations (max. 150 ml)
Code ID
56009
Result (%)
1,95
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
257
Events observed
5
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
4,41
Target range (reference range)
<= 6,86 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
4,35 - 4,47
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,75 - 4,21
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded in balloon catheter treatments (max. 200 ml)
Code ID
56010
Result (%)
Data protection
Evaluation through structured dialogue
An evaluation is not possible because there were no patients in the hospital to whom this quality criterion could be applied. (N01)
Population
Data protection
Events observed
Data protection
Anticipated events
Data protection
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
17,16
Target range (reference range)
<= 21,93 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
16,68 - 17,65
Hospital confidence interval (%)
0,00 - 0,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So rarely has the recommended amount of contrast medium been exceeded (max. 250 ml) during a cardiac catheter examination with directly subsequent balloon catheter treatment.
Code ID
56011
Result (%)
4,35
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
115
Events observed
5
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
9,88
Target range (reference range)
<= 16,84 % (95. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
9,77 - 10,00
Hospital confidence interval (%)
1,68 - 9,27
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
This is how often blood flow improved in patients with sudden severe symptoms and suspected heart attacks
Code ID
56014
Result (%)
100,00
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
18
Events observed
18
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
94,29
Target range (reference range)
>= 93,65 % (5. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
94,05 - 94,52
Hospital confidence interval (%)
87,14 - 100,00
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.
So often blood flow improved due to the cardiac catheterisation procedure
Code ID
56016
Result (%)
96,91
Evaluation through structured dialogue
The result is in the target area - the quality target is therefore considered to have been fully achieved. (R10)
Population
97
Events observed
94
Anticipated events
0,00
Result trend compared with the previous reporting year
unverändert
Comparison with the previous reporting year
eingeschränkt/nicht vergleichbar
National result (%)
95,31
Target range (reference range)
>= 93,95 % (5. Perzentil)
Confidence interval nationwide (%)
95,23 - 95,39
Hospital confidence interval (%)
91,98 - 99,12
Reference infection
No
Type of value
QI
Relation to the procedure
DeQS
Reference to other QA results
Sorting
Risk-adjusted rate
Comments/explanations by the competent authority at national or state level
Comments/explanations by the hospital
Specialist note IQTIG
The reference range indicates the results at which a facility can be assumed to provide good quality of care, although deviations are possible. The reference range thus establishes a benchmark for the evaluation of facilities. A result outside the reference range is initially considered conspicuous. This usually entails an analysis by means of a statement procedure. It should be noted that a quality result outside the reference range is not synonymous with a lack of quality of the facility in the quality aspect considered here. The deviation can also be due, for example, to incorrect documentation, medical specificity of the patient collective or individual cases. The evaluation of quality is carried out within the framework of the defined procedure in the comments procedure. More detailed information on reference areas can be found at the following link: https://iqtig.org/das-iqtig/grundlagen/methodische-grundlagen.