Universitätsklinikum Augsburg - Medizincampus

Quality results

Treatment sector: Pacemaker: First use (HSMDEF-HSM-IMPL) Explanation

Designation Herzschrittmacher - Implantation
Shortcut 09/1
Number of cases 278
Documentation rate 101.1 %
Hospital comment Die Dokumentationsrate wurde krankenhausbezogen berechnet.

Summary result:

In 10 of 10 quality characteristics, the quality objective was achieved.
No assessment is possible for any quality characteristic


Number of patients treated: 278

Quality objective achieved
Quality objective not achieved

The results in detail

Quality criterion
Hospital result
and target area
Quality objective
achieved?
All information
Verhältnis von tatsächlicher zu erwarteter Anzahl an Patient/innen, bei denen beim erstmaligen Einsetzen eines Herzschrittmachers die wissenschaftlich empfohlene maximale Strahlenbelastung überschritten wurde
Hospital: 0,28
Target area: at most 3,11
Quality objective achieved
This is how rarely complications occurred during the initial insertion of a pacemaker (other than malfunction or displacement of probes: including wound infections)
Hospital: Data protection

No information due to data protection

Target area: at most 2,60 %
Quality objective achieved
This is how often the pacemaker probes were advanced to the heart through the subclavian vein when a pacemaker was first implanted
Hospital: 71,01 %
as often as possible
Evaluation is not available
This is how often the decision to insert a pacemaker for the first time was made according to the scientifically recommended guidelines
Hospital: 95,64 %
Target area: at least 90,00 %
Quality objective achieved
Ratio of the number of problems encountered to the previously expected number (the individual risks of the patients were taken into account). The problems occurred in connection with an operation where a pacemaker was inserted (probe or pocket problems) and led to a new operation within one year
Hospital: 1,07
Target area: at most 2,69
Quality objective achieved
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of infections or complications that occurred which led to a new operation within one year (individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 0,00
Target area: at most 6,34
Quality objective achieved
Ratio of the actual number to the previously expected number of patients who died during their hospital stay (the individual risks of the patients were taken into account)
Hospital: 1,05
Target area: at most 4,38
Quality objective achieved
Duration of the operation (based on operations where a pacemaker was inserted for the first time or the housing of the pacemaker was replaced)
Hospital: 96,17 %
Target area: at least 60,00 %
Quality objective achieved
Various measurements during the operation have shown that the pacemaker?s wires were functioning properly
Hospital: 94,00 %
Target area: at least 90,00 %
Quality objective achieved
This ist how rarely displacements or malfunctions of probes occurred during or after insertion of the pacemaker
Hospital: 2,50 %
Target area: at most 3,00 %
Quality objective achieved
The pacemaker system was selected on the basis of recognised scientific recommendations
Hospital: 99,63 %
Target area: at least 90,00 %
Quality objective achieved